Four key pieces of legislation have shaped the market and limited the style of working. They are all loosely related to maximising HMRC's tax take, refered to by Government as 'paying your fair share of taxation'.
The Intermediaries Legislation 2000 (IR35)
This legislation placed responsibility for determining employment status with the contractor. Employment status effectively determines your tax position and impacts directly on your choice of trading options. The legislation seeks to differentiate between profressional contractors genuinely in business in their own right who provide their services with minimum levels of supervision and control and, individuals who, although they may not work under a contract of employment, can be regarded as 'disguised or deemed employees'. A 'deemed employee' even if working through your own limited company is unable to benefit from the tax advantages of taking part of your salary as a dividend. The IR35 legislation has resulted in increased tax, NIC liability and a significant increase in both risk and administration for those contractors using a Personal Service Company. This made the use of Umbrella Companies significantly more attractive.
The Conduct of Employment Agencies Act 2003 (EAA) and S44-47 ITEPA 2003
The net effect of these pieces of legislation were to make the employment of self-employed contractors far less attractive. If the contractor avoided paying the correct amount of tax, this legislation placed the onus of proof and responsibility for payment on the end client or the recruitment agency. As a result we saw a move away from the use of self-employed contractors and an increase in contractors working through Agency PAYE schemes.
The Managed Service Company Legislation 2007 (MSC)
This legislation was introduced to make the use of composite companies, where contractors were encouraged to trade through Limited Companies as one of several director/shareholders in order to attract the tax benefits available to genuine personal service companies. The companies were managed by a 3rd party or 'scheme provider' who ran the back-office and statutory administration. These schemes were clearly contrived, the contractors avoided taxation and responsibilities of running their own business. Although not outlawed the legislation removed all the tax advantages of this type of arrangement. A number of scheme providers have continued to operate and we understand these are being targeted by HMRC investigators.